El reflejo imperfecto: Inteligencia Artificial y la huella ontológica del humano

Authors

  • Seydel Ducosquel Instituto de Estudios Eclesiásticos P. Félix Varela de la Habana, Cuba.

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, relational ontology, human identity, emergence, philosophy of technology

Abstract

Creations, whether technological or otherwise, reveal aspects of their creators. In the case of Artificial Intelligence, this reflection, although limited, allows us to perceive an ontological imprint of human beings, pointing towards a specific ontological structure. This work aims to analyze not only how this reflection works, but above all, its implications for a deeper understanding of our identity as individuals and as humanity. The purpose is to understand how AI, as an imperfect reflection, can help us better understand our own nature and what its philosophical implications might be.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Chalmers, D. (1996) The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Chalmers, D. (2006) ‘Strong and Weak Emergence’, in Clayton, P. and Davies, P. (eds.) The

Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science and Religion. Oxford:

Oxford University Press, p244–254.

Deacon, T. (2011) Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York: W. W. Norton

& Company.

Dennett, D. (1988) ‘Quining Qualia’, in Rosenthal, D. (ed.) Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT

Press, p125–151.

Dennett, D. (1995) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Ferraris, M. (2014) Manifesto del Nuovo Realismo. Bari: Editori Laterza.

Galluzzi, A. (2024) Intelligenza Artificiale come specchio dell’umano, in Paiaia, G., Prete, R. and

Stefanutti, L. (eds.) Intelligenza Artificiale. Sviluppi future e tutela della persona. Padua: Triveneto

Theology Press, p53–69.

Heidegger, M. (1971) El Ser y El Tiempo. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica

Heidegger, M. (1977) The question concerning technology, in Heidegger, M. Basic Writings. New

York: Harper & Brown, p287–317.

Ihde, D. (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Mussell, H. (2024) Ontology, Relational Ethics, and Corporations. Berlin: Springer International

Publishing.

Nagel, T. (1974) What is it like to be a bat?, The Philosophical Review, 83(4), p435–450.

Schaab, G. (2013) Relational Ontology, in Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Heidelberg:

Springer Netherlands, p1974–1975.

Searle, J. (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Stiegler, B. (1998) Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University

Press. Monoskop+1

Vallor, S. (2024) The AI Mirror: How to reclaim our humanity in an age of machine thinking.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wildman, W. (2010) ‘An introduction to Relational Ontology’, in Polkinghorne, J. (ed.) The Trinity

and the Entangled World. Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, p55–74.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-21

How to Cite

Ducosquel, S. (2025). El reflejo imperfecto: Inteligencia Artificial y la huella ontológica del humano. Ética, economía Y Bienes Comunes, 22(2), 33–44. Retrieved from https://journal.upaep.mx/index.php/EthicsEconomicsandCommonGoods/article/view/417

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Research articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 Internal licenses. This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes, providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in a way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/